Fixes on getRelationshipInfo, ShouldUseNestedProcessor

pkg/common/adapters/database/bun.go

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/uptrace/bun"
 
 	"github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec/pkg/common"
+	"github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec/pkg/modelregistry"
 	"github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec/pkg/reflection"
 )
 
@@ -365,6 +366,14 @@ func (b *BunUpdateQuery) Model(model interface{}) common.UpdateQuery {
 
 func (b *BunUpdateQuery) Table(table string) common.UpdateQuery {
 	b.query = b.query.Table(table)
+	if b.model == nil {
+		// Try to get table name from table string if model is not set
+
+		model, err := modelregistry.GetModelByName(table)
+		if err == nil {
+			b.model = model
+		}
+	}
 	return b
 }
 

pkg/common/adapters/database/gorm.go

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
 	"gorm.io/gorm"
 
 	"github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec/pkg/common"
+	"github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec/pkg/modelregistry"
 	"github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec/pkg/reflection"
 )
 
@@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ func (g *GormSelectQuery) Table(table string) common.SelectQuery {
 	g.db = g.db.Table(table)
 	// Check if the table name contains schema (e.g., "schema.table")
 	g.schema, g.tableName = parseTableName(table)
+
 	return g
 }
 
@@ -340,6 +342,13 @@ func (g *GormUpdateQuery) Model(model interface{}) common.UpdateQuery {
 
 func (g *GormUpdateQuery) Table(table string) common.UpdateQuery {
 	g.db = g.db.Table(table)
+	if g.model == nil {
+		// Try to get table name from table string if model is not set
+		model, err := modelregistry.GetModelByName(table)
+		if err == nil {
+			g.model = model
+		}
+	}
 	return g
 }
 

pkg/common/recursive_crud.go

@@ -378,8 +378,16 @@ func (p *NestedCUDProcessor) getTableNameForModel(model interface{}, defaultName
 }
 
 // ShouldUseNestedProcessor determines if we should use nested CUD processing
-// It checks if the data contains nested relations or a _request field
+// It recursively checks if the data contains:
+// 1. A _request field at any level, OR
+// 2. Nested relations that themselves contain further nested relations or _request fields
+// This ensures nested processing is only used when there are deeply nested operations
 func ShouldUseNestedProcessor(data map[string]interface{}, model interface{}, relationshipHelper RelationshipInfoProvider) bool {
+	return shouldUseNestedProcessorDepth(data, model, relationshipHelper, 0)
+}
+
+// shouldUseNestedProcessorDepth is the internal recursive implementation with depth tracking
+func shouldUseNestedProcessorDepth(data map[string]interface{}, model interface{}, relationshipHelper RelationshipInfoProvider, depth int) bool {
 	// Check for _request field
 	if _, hasCRUDRequest := data["_request"]; hasCRUDRequest {
 		return true
@@ -407,19 +415,33 @@ func ShouldUseNestedProcessor(data map[string]interface{}, model interface{}, re
 		if relInfo != nil {
 			// Check if the value is actually nested data (object or array)
 			switch v := value.(type) {
-			case map[string]interface{}:
+			case map[string]interface{}, []interface{}, []map[string]interface{}:
-				//logger.Debug("Found nested relation field: %s", key)
+				// If we're already at a nested level (depth > 0) and found a relation,
-				return ShouldUseNestedProcessor(v, relInfo.RelatedModel, relationshipHelper)
+				// that means we have multi-level nesting, so return true
-			case []interface{}, []map[string]interface{}:
+				if depth > 0 {
-				//logger.Debug("Found nested relation field: %s", key)
+					return true
-				for _, item := range v.([]interface{}) {
+				}
-					if itemMap, ok := item.(map[string]interface{}); ok {
+				// At depth 0, recurse to check if the nested data has further nesting
-						if ShouldUseNestedProcessor(itemMap, relInfo.RelatedModel, relationshipHelper) {
+				switch typedValue := v.(type) {
+				case map[string]interface{}:
+					if shouldUseNestedProcessorDepth(typedValue, relInfo.RelatedModel, relationshipHelper, depth+1) {
+						return true
+					}
+				case []interface{}:
+					for _, item := range typedValue {
+						if itemMap, ok := item.(map[string]interface{}); ok {
+							if shouldUseNestedProcessorDepth(itemMap, relInfo.RelatedModel, relationshipHelper, depth+1) {
+								return true
+							}
+						}
+					}
+				case []map[string]interface{}:
+					for _, itemMap := range typedValue {
+						if shouldUseNestedProcessorDepth(itemMap, relInfo.RelatedModel, relationshipHelper, depth+1) {
 							return true
 						}
 					}
 				}
-				return false
 			}
 		}
 	}

pkg/restheadspec/handler.go

@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ func (h *Handler) handleUpdate(ctx context.Context, w common.ResponseWriter, id
 		dataMap["id"] = targetID
 
 		// Create update query
-		query := tx.NewUpdate().Table(tableName).SetMap(dataMap)
+		query := tx.NewUpdate().Model(model).Table(tableName).SetMap(dataMap)
 		pkName := reflection.GetPrimaryKeyName(model)
 		query = query.Where(fmt.Sprintf("%s = ?", common.QuoteIdent(pkName)), targetID)
 
@@ -1904,7 +1904,8 @@ func filterExtendedOptions(validator *common.ColumnValidator, options ExtendedRe
 }
 
 // shouldUseNestedProcessor determines if we should use nested CUD processing
-// It checks if the data contains nested relations or a _request field
+// It recursively checks if the data contains deeply nested relations or _request fields
+// Simple one-level relations without further nesting don't require the nested processor
 func (h *Handler) shouldUseNestedProcessor(data map[string]interface{}, model interface{}) bool {
 	return common.ShouldUseNestedProcessor(data, model, h)
 }
@@ -1966,12 +1967,40 @@ func (h *Handler) getRelationshipInfo(modelType reflect.Type, relationName strin
 				// Determine if it's belongsTo or hasMany/hasOne
 				if field.Type.Kind() == reflect.Slice {
 					info.relationType = "hasMany"
+					// Get the element type for slice
+					elemType := field.Type.Elem()
+					if elemType.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
+						elemType = elemType.Elem()
+					}
+					if elemType.Kind() == reflect.Struct {
+						info.relatedModel = reflect.New(elemType).Elem().Interface()
+					}
 				} else if field.Type.Kind() == reflect.Ptr || field.Type.Kind() == reflect.Struct {
 					info.relationType = "belongsTo"
+					elemType := field.Type
+					if elemType.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
+						elemType = elemType.Elem()
+					}
+					if elemType.Kind() == reflect.Struct {
+						info.relatedModel = reflect.New(elemType).Elem().Interface()
+					}
 				}
 			} else if strings.Contains(gormTag, "many2many") {
 				info.relationType = "many2many"
 				info.joinTable = h.extractTagValue(gormTag, "many2many")
+				// Get the element type for many2many (always slice)
+				if field.Type.Kind() == reflect.Slice {
+					elemType := field.Type.Elem()
+					if elemType.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
+						elemType = elemType.Elem()
+					}
+					if elemType.Kind() == reflect.Struct {
+						info.relatedModel = reflect.New(elemType).Elem().Interface()
+					}
+				}
+			} else {
+				// Field has no GORM relationship tags, so it's not a relation
+				return nil
 			}
 
 			return info

pkg/restheadspec/handler_nested_test.go

@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ func TestShouldUseNestedProcessor(t *testing.T) {
 		expected bool
 	}{
 		{
-			name: "Data with nested posts",
+			name: "Data with simple nested posts (no further nesting)",
 			data: map[string]interface{}{
 				"name": "John",
 				"posts": []map[string]interface{}{
@@ -140,7 +140,23 @@ func TestShouldUseNestedProcessor(t *testing.T) {
 				},
 			},
 			model:    TestUser{},
-			expected: true,
+			expected: false, // Simple one-level nesting doesn't require nested processor
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Data with deeply nested relations",
+			data: map[string]interface{}{
+				"name": "John",
+				"posts": []map[string]interface{}{
+					{
+						"title": "Post 1",
+						"comments": []map[string]interface{}{
+							{"content": "Comment 1"},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			model:    TestUser{},
+			expected: true, // Multi-level nesting requires nested processor
 		},
 		{
 			name: "Data without nested relations",
@@ -159,6 +175,20 @@ func TestShouldUseNestedProcessor(t *testing.T) {
 			model:    TestUser{},
 			expected: true,
 		},
+		{
+			name: "Nested data with _request field",
+			data: map[string]interface{}{
+				"name": "John",
+				"posts": []map[string]interface{}{
+					{
+						"_request": "insert",
+						"title":    "Post 1",
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			model:    TestUser{},
+			expected: true, // _request at nested level requires nested processor
+		},
 	}
 
 	for _, tt := range tests {