mirror of
https://github.com/bitechdev/ResolveSpec.git
synced 2026-01-02 18:04:25 +00:00
Better handling of preloads
This commit is contained in:
218
pkg/common/adapters/database/RELATION_LOADING.md
Normal file
218
pkg/common/adapters/database/RELATION_LOADING.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
|
||||
# Automatic Relation Loading Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**NEW:** The database adapters now **automatically** choose the optimal loading strategy by inspecting your model's relationship tags!
|
||||
|
||||
Simply use `PreloadRelation()` and the system automatically:
|
||||
- Detects relationship type from Bun/GORM tags
|
||||
- Uses **JOIN** for many-to-one and one-to-one (efficient, no duplication)
|
||||
- Uses **separate query** for one-to-many and many-to-many (avoids duplication)
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Just write this - the system handles the rest!
|
||||
db.NewSelect().
|
||||
Model(&links).
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Provider"). // ✓ Auto-detects belongs-to → uses JOIN
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Tags"). // ✓ Auto-detects has-many → uses separate query
|
||||
Scan(ctx, &links)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Detection Logic
|
||||
|
||||
The system inspects your model's struct tags:
|
||||
|
||||
**Bun models:**
|
||||
```go
|
||||
type Link struct {
|
||||
Provider *Provider `bun:"rel:belongs-to"` // → Detected: belongs-to → JOIN
|
||||
Tags []Tag `bun:"rel:has-many"` // → Detected: has-many → Separate query
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**GORM models:**
|
||||
```go
|
||||
type Link struct {
|
||||
ProviderID int
|
||||
Provider *Provider `gorm:"foreignKey:ProviderID"` // → Detected: belongs-to → JOIN
|
||||
Tags []Tag `gorm:"many2many:link_tags"` // → Detected: many-to-many → Separate query
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Type inference (fallback):**
|
||||
- `[]Type` (slice) → has-many → Separate query
|
||||
- `*Type` (pointer) → belongs-to → JOIN
|
||||
- `Type` (struct) → belongs-to → JOIN
|
||||
|
||||
### What Gets Logged
|
||||
|
||||
Enable debug logging to see strategy selection:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
bunAdapter.EnableQueryDebug()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
DEBUG: PreloadRelation 'Provider' detected as: belongs-to
|
||||
INFO: Using JOIN strategy for belongs-to relation 'Provider'
|
||||
DEBUG: PreloadRelation 'Links' detected as: has-many
|
||||
DEBUG: Using separate query for has-many relation 'Links'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship Types
|
||||
|
||||
| Bun Tag | GORM Pattern | Field Type | Strategy | Why |
|
||||
|---------|--------------|------------|----------|-----|
|
||||
| `rel:has-many` | Slice field | `[]Type` | Separate Query | Avoids duplicating parent data |
|
||||
| `rel:belongs-to` | `foreignKey:` | `*Type` | JOIN | Single parent, no duplication |
|
||||
| `rel:has-one` | Single pointer | `*Type` | JOIN | One-to-one, no duplication |
|
||||
| `rel:many-to-many` | `many2many:` | `[]Type` | Separate Query | Complex join, avoid cartesian |
|
||||
|
||||
## Manual Override
|
||||
|
||||
If you need to force a specific strategy, use `JoinRelation()`:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Force JOIN even for has-many (not recommended)
|
||||
db.NewSelect().
|
||||
Model(&providers).
|
||||
JoinRelation("Links"). // Explicitly use JOIN
|
||||
Scan(ctx, &providers)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Automatic Strategy Selection (Recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Example 1: Loading parent provider for each link
|
||||
// System detects belongs-to → uses JOIN automatically
|
||||
db.NewSelect().
|
||||
Model(&links).
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Provider", func(q common.SelectQuery) common.SelectQuery {
|
||||
return q.Where("active = ?", true)
|
||||
}).
|
||||
Scan(ctx, &links)
|
||||
|
||||
// Generated SQL: Single query with JOIN
|
||||
// SELECT links.*, providers.*
|
||||
// FROM links
|
||||
// LEFT JOIN providers ON links.provider_id = providers.id
|
||||
// WHERE providers.active = true
|
||||
|
||||
// Example 2: Loading child links for each provider
|
||||
// System detects has-many → uses separate query automatically
|
||||
db.NewSelect().
|
||||
Model(&providers).
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Links", func(q common.SelectQuery) common.SelectQuery {
|
||||
return q.Where("active = ?", true)
|
||||
}).
|
||||
Scan(ctx, &providers)
|
||||
|
||||
// Generated SQL: Two queries
|
||||
// Query 1: SELECT * FROM providers
|
||||
// Query 2: SELECT * FROM links
|
||||
// WHERE provider_id IN (1, 2, 3, ...)
|
||||
// AND active = true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Mixed Relationships
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
type Order struct {
|
||||
ID int
|
||||
CustomerID int
|
||||
Customer *Customer `bun:"rel:belongs-to"` // JOIN
|
||||
Items []Item `bun:"rel:has-many"` // Separate
|
||||
Invoice *Invoice `bun:"rel:has-one"` // JOIN
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// All three handled optimally!
|
||||
db.NewSelect().
|
||||
Model(&orders).
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Customer"). // → JOIN (many-to-one)
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Items"). // → Separate (one-to-many)
|
||||
PreloadRelation("Invoice"). // → JOIN (one-to-one)
|
||||
Scan(ctx, &orders)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
### Before (Manual Strategy Selection)
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// You had to remember which to use:
|
||||
.PreloadRelation("Provider") // Should I use PreloadRelation or JoinRelation?
|
||||
.PreloadRelation("Links") // Which is more efficient here?
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### After (Automatic Selection)
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Just use PreloadRelation everywhere:
|
||||
.PreloadRelation("Provider") // ✓ System uses JOIN automatically
|
||||
.PreloadRelation("Links") // ✓ System uses separate query automatically
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Guide
|
||||
|
||||
**No changes needed!** If you're already using `PreloadRelation()`, it now automatically optimizes:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Before: Always used separate query
|
||||
.PreloadRelation("Provider") // Inefficient: extra round trip
|
||||
|
||||
// After: Automatic optimization
|
||||
.PreloadRelation("Provider") // ✓ Now uses JOIN automatically!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Details
|
||||
|
||||
### Supported Bun Tags
|
||||
- `rel:has-many` → Separate query
|
||||
- `rel:belongs-to` → JOIN
|
||||
- `rel:has-one` → JOIN
|
||||
- `rel:many-to-many` or `rel:m2m` → Separate query
|
||||
|
||||
### Supported GORM Patterns
|
||||
- `many2many:` tag → Separate query
|
||||
- `foreignKey:` tag → JOIN (belongs-to)
|
||||
- `[]Type` slice without many2many → Separate query (has-many)
|
||||
- `*Type` pointer with foreignKey → JOIN (belongs-to)
|
||||
- `*Type` pointer without foreignKey → JOIN (has-one)
|
||||
|
||||
### Fallback Behavior
|
||||
- `[]Type` (slice) → Separate query (safe default for collections)
|
||||
- `*Type` or `Type` (single) → JOIN (safe default for single relations)
|
||||
- Unknown → Separate query (safest default)
|
||||
|
||||
## Debugging
|
||||
|
||||
To see strategy selection in action:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Enable debug logging
|
||||
bunAdapter.EnableQueryDebug() // or gormAdapter.EnableQueryDebug()
|
||||
|
||||
// Run your query
|
||||
db.NewSelect().
|
||||
Model(&records).
|
||||
PreloadRelation("RelationName").
|
||||
Scan(ctx, &records)
|
||||
|
||||
// Check logs for:
|
||||
// - "PreloadRelation 'X' detected as: belongs-to"
|
||||
// - "Using JOIN strategy for belongs-to relation 'X'"
|
||||
// - Actual SQL queries executed
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Use PreloadRelation() for everything** - Let the system optimize
|
||||
2. **Define proper relationship tags** - Ensures correct detection
|
||||
3. **Only use JoinRelation() for overrides** - When you know better than auto-detection
|
||||
4. **Enable debug logging during development** - Verify optimal strategies are chosen
|
||||
5. **Trust the system** - It's designed to choose correctly based on relationship type
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user