feat(writer): 🎉 Update relationship field naming convention
All checks were successful
CI / Test (1.24) (push) Successful in -27m26s
CI / Test (1.25) (push) Successful in -27m14s
CI / Lint (push) Successful in -27m27s
CI / Build (push) Successful in -27m36s
Release / Build and Release (push) Successful in -27m22s
Integration Tests / Integration Tests (push) Successful in -27m17s
All checks were successful
CI / Test (1.24) (push) Successful in -27m26s
CI / Test (1.25) (push) Successful in -27m14s
CI / Lint (push) Successful in -27m27s
CI / Build (push) Successful in -27m36s
Release / Build and Release (push) Successful in -27m22s
Integration Tests / Integration Tests (push) Successful in -27m17s
* Refactor generateRelationshipFieldName to use foreign key columns for unique naming. * Add test for multiple references to the same table to ensure unique relationship field names. * Update existing tests to reflect new naming convention.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ func (w *Writer) addRelationshipFields(modelData *ModelData, table *models.Table
|
||||
|
||||
// Create relationship field (has-one in Bun, similar to belongs-to in GORM)
|
||||
refModelName := w.getModelName(constraint.ReferencedTable)
|
||||
fieldName := w.generateRelationshipFieldName(constraint.ReferencedTable)
|
||||
fieldName := w.generateRelationshipFieldName(constraint)
|
||||
relationTag := w.typeMapper.BuildRelationshipTag(constraint, "has-one")
|
||||
|
||||
modelData.AddRelationshipField(&FieldData{
|
||||
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ func (w *Writer) addRelationshipFields(modelData *ModelData, table *models.Table
|
||||
if constraint.ReferencedTable == table.Name && constraint.ReferencedSchema == schema.Name {
|
||||
// Add has-many relationship
|
||||
otherModelName := w.getModelName(otherTable.Name)
|
||||
fieldName := w.generateRelationshipFieldName(otherTable.Name) + "s" // Pluralize
|
||||
fieldName := w.generateRelationshipFieldName(constraint) + "s" // Pluralize
|
||||
relationTag := w.typeMapper.BuildRelationshipTag(constraint, "has-many")
|
||||
|
||||
modelData.AddRelationshipField(&FieldData{
|
||||
@@ -310,10 +310,19 @@ func (w *Writer) getModelName(tableName string) string {
|
||||
return modelName
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// generateRelationshipFieldName generates a field name for a relationship
|
||||
func (w *Writer) generateRelationshipFieldName(tableName string) string {
|
||||
// Use just the prefix (3 letters) for relationship fields
|
||||
return GeneratePrefix(tableName)
|
||||
// generateRelationshipFieldName generates a field name for a relationship based on the foreign key column
|
||||
func (w *Writer) generateRelationshipFieldName(constraint *models.Constraint) string {
|
||||
// Use the foreign key column name to ensure uniqueness
|
||||
// If there are multiple columns, use the first one
|
||||
if len(constraint.Columns) > 0 {
|
||||
columnName := constraint.Columns[0]
|
||||
// Convert to PascalCase for proper Go field naming
|
||||
// e.g., "rid_filepointer_request" -> "RidFilepointerRequest"
|
||||
return "Rel" + SnakeCaseToPascalCase(columnName)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Fallback to table-based prefix if no columns defined
|
||||
return "Rel" + GeneratePrefix(constraint.ReferencedTable)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// getPackageName returns the package name from options or defaults to "models"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user